The Debate Over Jim Humble's MMS Treatment and FDA Concerns

---

In the spring of 2010, I embarked on a mission to find a cure for a friend suffering from bladder cancer. During my research, I came across the writings of Mr. Jim Humble on chlorine dioxide, also known as MMS (Miracle Mineral Solution). His accounts and case studies intrigued me and inspired me to explore the healing potential of this substance.

Approaching my experiments with caution, I followed Mr. Humble’s guidance. However, I soon realized that our understanding of MMS and chlorine dioxide was limited. The mechanisms of action and safe application of this substance remained largely unknown. The available information was complex, contradictory, and often misleading, making the correct usage of chlorine dioxide a daunting task.

This realization prompted me to embark on a decade-long journey of intensive research. I delved into scientific literature and conducted numerous experiments to uncover the true therapeutic potential of chlorine dioxide from chemical, biological, and medical perspectives. My laboratory became a hub of innovation, where I tested various formulations and methods, leading to the discovery of new ways to effectively combat different diseases.

Throughout this process, I transitioned from a learner and experimenter to an innovator. I filed several patents related to medical use of chlorine dioxide and authored papers, some of which have been published, while others are currently undergoing the submission process. These achievements not only enhanced the credibility of my research but also established me as a recognized expert in the global community of utilizing chlorine dioxide for disease treatment.

It is important to note that my intention is not to refute Mr. Humble’s MMS protocol, but rather to present an updated perspective on the evolution of MMS. I want readers to understand that this book aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of chlorine dioxide and its applications, ensuring that more people can benefit from this treatment method in a safe and informed manner.

Throughout my journey, I have been driven by a deep commitment and unwavering belief in the remarkable possibilities of chlorine dioxide. My ultimate goal is to spread awareness and understanding of this technology so that more people can experience its benefits and enhance their overall health and well-being. This book serves as a platform to educate and empower individuals to embrace the potential of chlorine dioxide for their own wellness journey. Together, we can unlock the transformative power of this technology and pave the way for a healthier future.

Chlorine dioxide’s initial use against diseases can likely be traced back to Mr. Jim Humble’s MMS, who is said to be an aerospace engineer. Miracle Mineral Supplement (MMS), sometimes also referred to as Miracle Mineral Solution, Master Mineral Solution, or the Chlorine dioxide protocol, is a solution containing chlorine dioxide, initiated and promoted by Jim Humble[1]. In 2006, Jim Humble self-published a book titled “The Miracle Mineral Solution of the 21st Century,” in which he laid out his theories. He claimed that this solution could cure a variety of diseases, including malaria, HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, herpes, and cancer.

Jim Humble’s reasoning was straightforward; he believed that up to 95% of diseases are caused by pathogens that can be killed, and since chlorine dioxide is a recognized disinfectant effective against various pathogens, it could treat these diseases. He stated, “MMS has no nutritional value whatsoever. It is a killer, only. It kills pathogens and oxidizes heavy metal poisons. It does nothing else.” Interestingly, if one disregards the accuracy of the premises, the logic could be considered sound. However, he might not be a good biologist or medical expert, merely a chemist. The assertion that “up to 95% of diseases are caused by pathogens that can be killed” is certainly incorrect. Moreover, eliminating a causative agent does not equate to curing the disease; the symptoms affecting health have already manifested, and most disease symptoms are irreversible.

In the medical field, as many diseases still lack a definitive cure, numerous patients have turned to self-treatment. Against this backdrop, the MMS advocated by Jim Humble has garnered the attention and trial of millions worldwide. The internet has also facilitated the formation of disease-related communities where members actively share their experiences with the MMS protocol and display notable discontent towards skeptics.

I estimate that in the past nearly two decades, possibly millions have attempted to use chlorine dioxide to treat various diseases. Since chlorine dioxide is not approved as a drug in any country, using it as a treatment almost certainly constitutes a challenge to local drug regulatory authorities. The official stance is that chlorine dioxide is an industrial bleach, and MMS has been mistakenly promoted as a cure for diseases, including HIV, cancer, and the common cold. It is produced by mixing a sodium chlorite solution with an acid (such as the juice of citrus fruits or vinegar). This generates chlorine dioxide, a toxic chemical that can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and life-threatening low blood pressure due to dehydration.

Authorities worldwide have taken action against it, notably in July 2010, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a similar notice, warning that MMS prepared by mixing a sodium chlorite solution with an acid (such as the juice of citrus fruits) produces chlorine dioxide, “a potent bleach used for stripping textiles and industrial water treatment.” The FDA has advised consumers to stop using the product and dispose of it immediately due to reports of severe nausea, vomiting, and dangerous low blood pressure following consumption[2].

Given the FDA’s authority, the use and trade of MMS have retreated into the shadows or the gray areas of the internet. Despite this, some individuals ignore the FDA’s warnings and continue to promote and sell MMS-like products, facing firm official crackdowns. On May 28, 2015, a U.S. federal jury convicted Louis Daniel Smith of conspiracy, smuggling, selling misbranded drugs, and defrauding the United States in connection with the sale of Miracle Mineral Supplement. Evidence presented in court indicated that Smith had set up fake water purification and wastewater treatment businesses to acquire sodium chlorite and distribute MMS without detection by the government. On October 28, 2015, Smith was sentenced to serve 51 months in federal prison, followed by three years of supervised release.

Setting aside the official stance, I’ve also observed some individuals who, despite questioning Jim Humble’s understanding of human biochemistry, remain convinced of MMS’s efficacy. For instance, in 2017, a person named Bob published a blog post titled “MMS Jim Humble the Good the Bad the Truth,” where he did not oppose MMS but believed Jim Humble’s grasp of human biochemistry to be utterly 

incorrect.

The presence of MMS and other alternative therapies can be attributed to the challenges faced in modern medical research.

We must understand that there is a conflict between the modern medical research system and alternative therapies like MMS. This is not a problem specific to MMS, but rather a challenge within the framework of modern medicine.

For example, there have been reported cases where patients developed adverse reactions after consuming MMS. In one case, a patient developed Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease, which was attributed to the inflammatory response triggered by the solution [3]. However, it is important to note that this case report may have misrepresented the composition of MMS. The report mentions sodium chlorite as the main ingredient, whereas the primary component of MMS is chlorine dioxide.

Additionally, in the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory bodies that adhere to the modern medical system have set high standards for the approval of new drugs. Only substances that are difficult to manufacture and have patent protection are likely to be considered for new drug applications by pharmaceutical companies. Common substances like MMS do not receive the necessary support and resources to undergo the process of new drug approval.

Current medical research exhibits a reductionist trend, emphasizing understanding life processes and pathological states by studying the most fundamental building blocks of organisms—molecules. This approach has its advantages, such as helping scientists uncover the molecular mechanisms of diseases and discovering new drug targets. However, reductionism has a fatal flaw:

• Neglecting Complexity: Biological systems are highly complex and dynamic, and changes in a single molecule may not suffice to explain changes in the entire system. Diseases are often the result of multiple factors interacting, and reductionism might overlook this system-level complexity.
• Overlooking Environmental Factors: The onset of diseases is related not only to individual molecular and genetic factors but is also influenced by a variety of factors such as environment, lifestyle, and psychological state. An excessive focus on the molecular level might neglect these important environmental and social factors.
• Limitations of Disease Models: Studying diseases at the molecular level often requires the establishment of simplified models, such as cell cultures or animal models. These models may not fully replicate the complexity of human diseases, thus limiting the applicability of research findings.
• Individual Differences in Treatment: Even with the same molecular targets, different individuals may respond differently to treatments. Reductionism may not adequately explain these differences between individuals.

While molecular research has significantly advanced medicine, the field is increasingly adopting a systems biology approach. This method integrates information across different levels—from molecules to cells, tissues, organs, and the entire organism—and factors in genetics, environment, and lifestyle for a more comprehensive understanding of disease. However, current systems biology theories often follow a reductionist path, attempting to exhaustively map relationships between variables at all levels. This seems unattainable. Aiming for a simple, elegant theory of life’s essence, like Schrödinger’s concept of negative entropy, is a more suitable goal for systems biology than constructing a complex model with all variables.

Upon analyzing the drug development process, it’s evident that aside from serendipitous discoveries, most new drugs originate from in-depth molecular studies, seemingly validating reductionism. Yet, when examining the effectiveness of current medical treatments, the number of curable diseases is disappointingly small compared to the vast array of human diseases. This suggests the need for new research approaches.

Similar to how mathematical modeling in complex sciences often omits certain details to highlight key variables, systems biology research should also discard variables that cancel each other out or are too complex to decipher. I propose a new method for systems biology research: stratifying complex systems and establishing clear boundaries between levels. We should focus on levels where human intervention can achieve specific goals. If a level’s variables are too numerous, the structure too complex, beyond our research and computational capabilities, or if comprehensive intervention is unfeasible, the research focus should shift to a higher level. For instance, if genomic research is too intricate, we might move to the proteomic level, and if that’s still unmanageable, we proceed to the cellular level. At the cellular level, we consider the average effects of genes and proteins instead of their specific variables.

I firmly believe that my exploration and development of the therapeutic potential of chlorine dioxide is rooted in this innovative research philosophy. Initially, in my study of chlorine dioxide, I focused on its effects at the cellular level, disregarding whether it damages the cell membrane or DNA. Additionally, I observed similarities between chlorine dioxide and certain substances in the body’s adaptive system. By simply mimicking ROS in experimental simulations, I found that chlorine dioxide exhibits a triple effect, including the elimination of abnormal cells, promotion of tissue regeneration, and modulation of immune responses. Considering the fundamental chemical properties of chlorine dioxide, I believe it is essential to deliver it directly to the affected areas as a core principle in disease treatment.

While I am convinced of the broad therapeutic effects of chlorine dioxide, I am also aware of the need to adhere to current medical regulations. I am committed to following the standard process for new drug development to advance it to clinical trials. I understand that many readers may be disillusioned with existing medical technologies.